![mme effect as opaque mme effect as opaque](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lnjK0a3fEl0/hqdefault.jpg)
Therefore, a clear image is seen on the other side of the substance. While passing through a transparent object, the amount of scattering is very less.
![mme effect as opaque mme effect as opaque](https://html.scirp.org/file/3-7301783x4.png)
Light rays follow Snell’s law of refraction. Most of the light, incident on a transparent object, transmits through it. The refractive index of transparent substances is nearly uniform. Light rays can pass through these substances. Some examples are oily paper, tissue, some plastics, etc.Ĭomparison Between Transparent, Translucent and Opaque Substances Any object, seen through a translucent material, appears fuzzy or blurred. A part of the incident light may get reflected or scattered, as it passes through the interior of the material. Translucent materials allow partial transmission of light through them. As a result, light rays cannot pass through opaque materials. Opaque materials either reflect or absorb any incident light. One example of transparent material is pure glass. Any object can be seen through a transparent material. Materials, which allow complete transmission of light, are called transparent. Materials can be classified based on the amount of light they transmit. Crucial reading for anyone interested in critical assessment of our present values.Definition of Transparent, Translucent, and Opaque Objects Rather than an ideal of democratic freedom, transparency mobilizes distrust and commands exposure. As the contributors draw out the normative presumptions of the concept, they alert us to its regulatory effects, its implications for surveillance and subjectivation. “This important collection historicizes and criticizes transparency, one of neoliberalism’s most ubiquitous norms.
![mme effect as opaque mme effect as opaque](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0573/0454/7478/products/av72290_2048x_ec0b16f4-1537-4b6d-a86d-9595f2e7b647_large.jpg)
By offering a bold and comprehensive picture of the new field of Critical Transparency Studies, this collection of essays is certain to become the standard reference for years to come.” (Giovanna Borradori, Professor of Philosophy at Vassar College, USA) But the more we critically examine what transparency actually means, the more it emerges as an opaque, and perhaps even occluding, concept.
![mme effect as opaque mme effect as opaque](https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0895981121002741-gr2.jpg)
25, 2019)“Incessantly invoked as a necessary condition of all aspects of democratic life, transparency is being hailed as a top priority in public management, corporate business, and international relations. … I can warmly recommend reading the book to anyone who is interested in our current culture of transparency, its promises, and in particular its perils.” (Ida Koivisto, Res Publica, Vol. “The book is a very welcome contribution to transparency literature. By studying its appearances in today’s hyper-mediated economies of information and by linking it back to its historical roots, the book analyzes transparency and its discontents, and scrutinizes the reasons why it has become the imperative of a supposedly post-ideological age. Bringing together prominent scholars from the emerging field of Critical Transparency Studies, the book offers a map of the various sites at which transparency has become virulent and connects the dots between past and present. In a suspicious manner, transparency is entangled in the discourses on power, surveillance, and self-exposure. Today, transparency has become a catchword outplaying other Enlightenment values like empowerment, sincerity and the notion of a public sphere. The book carefully examines this notion in its own right, traces its emergence in Early Modernity and analyzes its omnipresence in contemporary rhetoric. This book critically engages with the idea of transparency whose ubiquitous demand stands in stark contrast to its lack of conceptual clarity.